my favorites list boards post

first

previous
382
of
382

next

last
#55854
304 posts
3 points
[profile]
literallysublime 2010-04-14T08:57:41
subject: re: popestasy
in reply to what in message #11428:
Also, there's a priest actively calling for el papa's resignation. Of course, if I remember my history correctly the last time that happened was in 14 something or other when the papacy was moved to Avignon and there were 2 popes. I'm not holding my breath or anything. Also interesting to note that the Vatican gardens grow all kinds of things. Things like hemlock, nightshade, and foxglove. Also there is a precedent for the Church taking matters into their own hands. I believe that almost all of the early popes were "martyred." If there's a real danger of information coming out that Benedict XVI knew signifigantly more than he has been saying I wouldn't be overly surprised if Josef Cardinal Ratzinger had a sudden heart attack and then Habemus Papem! And a third Vatican Council comes quickly thereafter. Maybe we'll luck up and get a Jesuit this time around, but I doubt that too.

Listen carefully to me old devil, I'm only interested in two things. See if you can guess what they are.
11431 [save my place] [reply]
#27782
1245 posts
11 points
[profile]
cyco 2010-04-14T11:40:39
subject: re: popestasy
in reply to chuckster in message #11430:
Now that was funny and wrong on so many levels. Would be good if someone could invert something like that. Though there would be a lot of pissed off priests. :P

Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals open your eyes.
Leonardo dv Vinci
11432 [save my place] [reply]
#19267
774 posts
6 points
[profile]
chuckster 2010-04-14T19:07:20
subject: re: popestasy
in reply to cyco in message #11432:
Wrong? What wrong?

11433 [save my place] [reply]
#14182
1663 posts
12 points
[profile]
what 2010-04-15T19:14:22
subject: re: popestasy
in reply to literallysublime in message #11431:
I doubt they would really be so self-regulating. It would be a nice modernist twist, though. That would make a much better sequel to the Da Vinci Code.

I had margaritas for beer.
11434 [save my place] [reply]
#19267
774 posts
6 points
[profile]
chuckster 2010-05-01T00:40:08
subject: A new classic
And it's catchy too!

11435 [save my place] [reply]
#126595
403 posts
1 points
[profile]
metalyxmii 2010-05-04T01:32:11
subject: For Your pleasure
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RB3g6mXLEKk

All universal moral principles are idle fancies.
-Marquis De Sade
11436 [save my place] [reply]
#19267
774 posts
6 points
[profile]
chuckster 2010-05-04T20:45:17
subject: re: For Your pleasure
in reply to metalyxmii in message #11436:
I am pleased. I am unpleased. Correct!

11437 [save my place] [reply]
#126595
403 posts
1 points
[profile]
metalyxmii 2010-05-04T22:00:42
subject: re: For Your pleasure
in reply to chuckster in message #11437:
Will the world last forever?

Yes.
No.

Inexplicably correct!

All universal moral principles are idle fancies.
-Marquis De Sade
11438 [save my place] [reply]
#19267
774 posts
6 points
[profile]
chuckster 2010-05-04T22:03:56
subject: re: For Your pleasure
in reply to metalyxmii in message #11438:
Do I care?

Yes.
No.

Correct again.

11439 [save my place] [reply]
#2731
2488 posts
15 points
[profile]
paradox 2010-06-02T16:30:43
subject: re: :/
Jade,

I can understand where you are coming from, however...

The weakness in your argument is it's basis on a diametric perspective; it seems you are implying that God has to be all-accommodating to our sense of fairness or preferences for comfort in order to be truly benevolent or just. Your hypothetical parent-child relationship is useful only to a point; doesn't a parent also have to allow their child to experience consequences in order to learn the value of responsibility, and failure and loss in order to learn value? A God who would smooth over every bump would just be coddling us, and we would never grow up to value life or who He really is.



I am Spartacus!
11440 [save my place] [reply]
#19267
774 posts
6 points
[profile]
chuckster 2010-06-08T20:07:54
subject: Mosque at Ground Zero
So, does anyone have a positive take on the mosque being built 'at' ground zero?

11441 [save my place] [reply]
#21137
6523 posts
21 points
[profile]
jadefalcon1 2010-06-09T09:29:33
subject: re: Mosque at Ground Zero
in reply to chuckster in message #11441:
Yes, will explain later.

Paradox: I will definitely respond. Been crazy-busy lately.

~Jade Falcon
[mail][blog][page]
"I could pull a Kit, and start stripping." ~What
11442 [save my place] [reply]
#2731
2488 posts
15 points
[profile]
paradox 2010-06-09T11:21:32
subject: re: Mosque at Ground Zero
in reply to jadefalcon1 in message #11442:
No problem, same here. Look forward to reading it when you get a chance.



"Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind." -- Albert Einstein
11443 [save my place] [reply]
#19267
774 posts
6 points
[profile]
chuckster 2010-06-10T21:19:43
subject: re: Mosque at Ground Zero
in reply to jadefalcon1 in message #11442:
Your positive take. Would that be something like, "Give em enough rope and they'll hang themselves?"

11444 [save my place] [reply]

first

previous
382
of
382

next

last
username


password

[go]